Category Archive: Polyurea vs Polyurethane

Crusher Backing Solutions from Copps: Better for Equipment, Your People, and the Environment

In the dynamic, demanding world of aggregate and mining, there’s zero time for unplanned equipment downtime. When it hits, production halts. Profitability crashes. And jobs can be at stake.

To help minimize the ripple effects of downtime, on-site managers and engineers alike count on crusher backing solutions from Copps. For over 45 years we’ve established a proven track record – as well as a trust – that once our solutions disappear into critical parts of a machine, they do what we promise: help keep operations online, on time, and equipment operating efficiently for longer. For anything that needs crushing, under the most extreme conditions, anywhere in the world. And it’s with the world in mind that we develop our products. Not just for the job at hand today, but with long-term implications in mind for your people and the environment as well. In fact, Copps is the only company to date to offer non-corrosive versions of standard and high-performance crusher backing options. We don’t just lead this market in environmentally conscious solutions – we are the market.

Raising the Bar for Your Toughest Jobs

While some well-known, established companies choose only to offer one type of backing product, our experience, expertise, and chemistry tell us that different materials and machines require different solutions.

That’s why we formulate and offer both standard as well as premier, high-performance versions of our products, designed specifically for your toughest jobs. All as we continue to lead the way in our commitment to the environment by offering eco-conscious versions of our crusher backing solutions.

Standard Crusher Backing

Recommended for use in most (including severe) crushing applications. With uniform consistency, pourability, and cured toughness it offers elevated compressive strength, service temperature, and impact resistance. Does not contain VOCs, butyl glycidyl ether (BGE), or nonylphenol.

Non-Corrosive Standard Backing

A DOT non-corrosive version of our standard backing formulated to address environmental, workplace safety, and shipping concerns. It provides the same support or “backup” for manganese steel or alloy wear parts in cone and gyratory crushers as our traditional material, and is butyl glycidyl ether (BGE), VOC, and nonyl phenol free!

XP-2000 High-Performance Backing

The ultimate backing material for the toughest, most demanding crushing applications. Uniquely designed with extreme impact resistance, very low water absorption, and the ability to withstand hard or abrasive material and high-temperature crushing environments. Does not contain VOCs, butyl glycidyl ether (BGE), or nonylphenol.

XP-3000 High-Performance Non-Corrosive Backing

The DOT non-corrosive version of our current ultimate backing material. Designed to engage the most challenging crushing conditions: gyrators, primary crushing, wet crushing, and hard or excessively abrasive media. Does not contain BGE, VOCs, or nonylphenol. It offers exceptional heat, water, and shrinkage resistance.

What Crusher Backing Compounds Do For You

The stresses your equipment faces day in and day out, hour after hour, are immense. Our crusher backing compounds help protect it all from unnecessary damage and assist in long-term wear by filling the open cavities behind wear parts and supporting crushing wear surfaces. In doing so, our compounds help to minimize the effect of friction, vibration, and impact on the machinery during crushing operations. They offer a range of benefits for mining and aggregate operations including:

Extended Machinery Life
Applying crusher backing compounds on an appropriate maintenance schedule substantially extends the life of equipment and related components, minimizes downtime, and lowers replacement part costs.

Low Shrinkage
Using a properly formulated crusher backing compound engineered to manage shrinkage during the hardening or curing stage greatly reduces the risk of voids and misalignments between liners.

High Strength
Our compounds offer a higher level of compressive strength, a broader array of service temperatures, and higher impact and vibration resistance to improve component and machine efficiency and durability.

Gap Elimination
Eliminating wear liner gaps and smoothing alignment errors provides equipment with superior impact resistance compared to equipment not treated with a crusher backing compound.

Performance, Profitability, and More.

Across the US and around the world, mining companies today are coming under scrutiny. While keeping up performance and remaining profitable will always be job number one, mining leaders are being asked to do more than ever. Like enhancing commitments to the environment and making conscious efforts to improve workforce health and safety.

With the crusher backing solutions offered by Copps on-site and at the ready, you can do both.

To learn more about our crusher backing compounds or other epoxy-based solutions, contact us or request a quote.


Put the power and innovation of Copps Industries to work for you today. From our commitment to the environment and sustainability to our private label offerings and “virtual chemist” opportunities, we’re ready to help create better solutions for you.

Polyurea vs. Polyurethane: Similarities, Differences, and Applications

Polyurea and polyurethane are ideal for manufacturing protective linings and coatings. The two materials share many similarities and can often be used interchangeably. However, there are several distinct differences that should be considered when choosing between the polymer compounds. From chemical composition to curing time, these differences lend unique advantages and disadvantages depending on the intended application.

Polyurea vs Polyurethane

Polyurethane and polyurea share many similarities — one of the biggest being that, in their final forms, they are capable of curing into very flexible to very stiff coatings. Polyurethane has been a standard sealant and adhesive material for decades. It is created from a reaction between a polyol and an isocyanate, creating a waterproof coating with high resistance to certain acids. This makes polyurethane ideal for use in the food industry, where frequent contact with food-related acids is expected.

Polyureas are a more modern addition to the sealant and coating industry. They are formed when multifunctional amine reacts with an isocyanate. The compound reacts faster than polyurethane, creating a gel in only seconds after mixing the ingredients.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Polyurea vs Polyurethane

The unique compositions of the two substances provide them with advantages and disadvantages based on the application. Both compounds are ideal protective coatings for concrete, reducing the damaging effects of chemical exposure, corrosion, abrasion, and moisture. Polyurethanes offer the following advantages:

  • Facilitates application in two parts for more versatility
  • Less expensive than polyurea
  • Resistant to damaging UV rays
  • Curing time can be set from one minute to several hours depending on the mixture

Polyurethanes also have unique disadvantages compared to polyurea coatings. When applying polyurethane, users must pay attention to the temperature and humidity level. The chemical reaction is sensitive to temperatures less than 32°F. Polyurethane coatings may blister when applied at humidity levels higher than 70%.

Polyurea offers the following advantages:

  • Pleasant appearance with various pigment options
  • Easy to work with
  • Applicable at temperatures as low as -20°F
  • Performs well in humid environments
  • Quick curing time allows for application in harsh conditions
  • Withstands extreme environments

Several factors put polyurea at a disadvantage compared to polyurethane. Polyurea can be expensive to apply because technicians must be highly trained to work with the incredibly fast-curing compound before it sets. With little resistance to UV damage, the appearance of polyurea can become chalky, discolored, and dull when exposed to UV rays.

Applications of Polyurea vs Polyurethane

Polyurea and polyurethane’s unique characteristics make them ideal for use in differing applications. Polyurea’s resistance to harsh environments makes it ideal for construction applications. It is suitable for bridges, car parks, decks, roof repairs, and aesthetically appealing surface coatings for floors. The oil, coatings, marine, and other industrial industries depend on polyurea for a wide range of uses.

Polyurethane’s low cost and manageable application make it suitable for cars, furniture, housing, and shoes. It can also be used in manufacturing hard protective coatings and foam insulation for mattresses.

Polyurea vs. Polyurethane Coatings From Copps Industries

Polyurea and polyurethane are valuable coating and lining compounds for many industries. While polyurethane coatings are affordable and offer UV resistance, they are more susceptible to damage in humid or freezing environments. Polyurea resists extreme conditions and cures incredibly fast but can be more expensive.

Copps Industries has over 40 years of experience in the epoxy business and maintains an ISO 9001-2015 certification to deliver the highest quality products and services. We focus on providing industry-leading customer service and high-quality products. We offer a wide range of products to suit numerous applications. At Copps Industries, we formulate each of our systems in the USA. We are building the future of green epoxies by developing environmentally friendly solutions.

Contact us to speak with our experts about our capabilities and custom solutions for your application or request a quote today.